CFO

Cyber risk in financial language, with method, confidence, and assumptions visible before the ask.

Valty gives CFOs inspectable financial exposure estimates with FAIR-style assumptions, scenario drivers, and the evidence chain needed for insurance renewal, board reporting, and IC decision support.

Review the financial-risk model

AssumeInspect

Method and confidence adjacent to every estimate, never a naked number.

ModelChallenge

Scenario drivers and sensitivity view so assumptions can be questioned.

RenewPackage

Evidence summary for insurance renewal, board review, or IC meeting.

Operating questions

The three questions this page has to answer.

Board, operating, and proof questions arrive from different seats. The same evidence model has to answer all three without contradicting itself.

Board question

What is the financial materiality of the cyber risk we are accepting this quarter?

A board-level cyber risk number is only credible when method, confidence range, and key assumptions are visible alongside the estimate.

Operating question

Are the security investments we are making actually reducing EBITDA exposure?

CFOs need to see the delta: which remediation actions changed the exposure estimate, by how much, and what evidence supports the movement.

Proof needed

What can we give the insurer or auditor that will hold up to scrutiny?

Insurance renewal and audit defense require evidence packages with source, confidence, and freshness, not a deck assembled the week before the review.

Primary surface

Every estimate carries its method, confidence band, and source coverage.

The EBITDA bridge shows the exposure estimate with assumption breakdown, confidence range, and source coverage adjacent, so CFOs can challenge the number rather than accept or reject it without context.

EBITDA bridge with scenario drivers and sensitivity
P10 / base / P90 confidence range per estimate
Assumption log with method, source, and reviewable inputs
Investment delta view: which actions moved the exposure and by how much

Quantify product surface — **Quantify**Dollar impact is shown with assumptions nearby, so the number can be challenged instead of trusted blindly.

Proof matrix

Claims a CFO can make safely with Valty

Financial claims require method, confidence, and source coverage visible before export. Estimates are decision-support, not warranties.

EBITDA exposure estimate

Source: FAIR-style model with visible inputs
Confidence: Decision-support only, labeled
Freshness: Tied to source coverage date and model version

Confidence range (P10–P90)

Source: Model sensitivity + assumption distribution
Confidence: Inspectable, not an audit opinion
Freshness: Recalculated on source or assumption update

Remediation ROI estimate

Source: Exposure delta per funded action
Confidence: Model-based, requires assumption review
Freshness: Updated when action queue changes

Insurance renewal evidence package

Source: Control catalog + exposure summary
Confidence: Evidence-backed, reviewable
Freshness: Freshness visible before submission

Blocked financial claim

Source: Stale or missing source evidence
Confidence: Not publishable without refresh
Freshness: Requires source owner action

Inspect the model before you take the number to the board.

Valty gives CFOs the assumption log, confidence band, and source citations alongside every estimate, so the financial claim can be challenged, not just accepted.